Here is one woman who you don't want to piss off at work:
Dear Mother and daughter tag-team of retardation who were my last table tonight...
Thank you.
Read More of "Frisbee Blue-Plate Special"
Thank you sooooo much for just everything about waiting on you. It was a real kick to bring you go-boxes before ya even ordered and I also truly enjoyed being asked utterly STOOPID questions like: "What's in the mixed vegetables?" (/whining voice) You came closer than you'll ever know to being told, "Bacon, dog shit and cardboard, of course..."
Pinheads.
And, I hope you enjoyed every minute of your sitting there for that fuckin' HOUR after you were done as much as I enjoyed sitting on that 200 lb. bag of sugar back behind the kitchen WAITING for you to STFU and leave (damn you!) so I could get the damned tip and go home myself. Ah, the roar of the cooks and the smell of the grease... or was that "the smell of the cooks..."?
I'm just sitting here thanking GOD that y'all were my last table and not my first. I'd probably have frisbeed you your shit and left early if ya's hadda been.
I'm telling ya, if we could surcharge you dipshits for the "pain in the ass" quotient, I coulda retired after you two.
Here's hoping your flounder parm makes you repeat like a Howitzer til Christmas.
Bite my achin' ass,
me
I love this part:
...frisbeed you your shit... LMAO!!
Could you imagine what the court transcripts would be like if Stevie were ever to become a lawyer??
(By way of Mad William Flint of the Universal Church of Cosmic Uncertanty)
All done with "Frisbee Blue-Plate Special"?
Comments on Frisbee Blue-Plate Special
Are you the 'mikem' from An American in T.O.???
Just wondering.
|| Posted by 1th@troll.com, November 28, 2004 09:48 PM ||No. What the Hell is "An American in T.O."??
|| Posted by Mad Mikey, November 29, 2004 11:02 AM ||Mikey, check the MuNu blogroll sometime for an answer to that one ;)
|| Posted by Pixy Misa, December 9, 2004 01:57 PM ||Actually, it's "Being American in T.O.", but anyway...
|| Posted by Pixy Misa, December 9, 2004 01:58 PM |||| , 02:18 PM || Permalink || Hide Comments || Add your comment
Stumped
I'm curious about something.....
If someone has a blog and posts something that you believe is not factual, is it your perogative to go hunting for proof that backs your claim or is the onus on the blogger to back up their assertions with credible facts?
There is one blog that I keep 'challenging' the owner about the sources of some of their more....insane opinions and whenever I ask where did they read/learn/hear about the topic in question, I get static about looking for myself to back up their claims.
Just curious as to who the responsibility is on: the person on the soapbox or someone in the crowd.
UPDATE
Thanks for the comments, but I wanted to edit/amend this a little because (to me) it appears as though I'm whining. I'm not.
Just more.....confused as to the proper etiquette when initiating a debate, so as to not come across as a beserk troll looking to just annoy someone about anything they post.
Comments on Stumped
I would say the original blogger should offer credible facts for the claims they make. Its kind of like work, can't just tell the boss that we should use black steel pipe you have to provide a reason why. However when countering a claim, I would have the same demands for factual evedince to support the counter-claim.
As for the inital factual support for the inial claim, that blogger should provide it, if they had any desire to appear credible.
|| Posted by the Pirate, November 26, 2004 12:39 PM ||Well, Mikey, it's their blog, they can write whatever they want and don't have to show 'proof' of anything. IMNSHO, if they can't or won't back it up, good riddance to them. But if I want to prove someone is wrong, or that I'm right, I'll go look it up.
It's frustrating though, when you read something and scratch your head going, "Where the hell'd they get that???"
Hey... you're not talking about me here are ya??? ;)
|| Posted by scroff, November 26, 2004 02:21 PM ||Hey... you're not talking about me here are ya???
Nope - not you. You back up your arguments.
|| Posted by Mad Mikey, November 26, 2004 02:39 PM ||Nope - not you. You back up your arguments.
*Whew*
You realize that's only because I hate looking like a fool.
|| Posted by scroff, November 26, 2004 02:50 PM ||It's their blog, so they can do whatever they want, up to (and including) deleting your comments (even if the comments provide facts to back your position), or telling you to do the research yourself (which is usually the last fallback of a weak mind, although I have used it when someone starts playing the five whys game with me).
However, there is NOTHING stopping you from linking to their idiocy and activating the flamethrower. The only thing they can do is delete the trackback (if any) or try to rebut you here. If they don't have facts to buttress their arguments, they end up looking like idiots.
|| Posted by timekeeper, November 26, 2004 04:03 PM ||Well, I didn't think you were whining, Mad One...
as far as your clarification... I don't know if there is any 'rule of thumb', I'd be interested in hearing the answer to this one, too.
|| Posted by scroff, November 26, 2004 07:03 PM ||I agree with Scroff and the others. It's good sense to have factual sources to back up whatever you post. But if a commenter wants to counter the argument, I think he needs to have factual sources as well. Of course, if a blogger just wants to throw out unproven bullshit as fact, that's their perogative, I suppose. I know that I won't waste a click on that sort of crap. And, no, Scroff, you're not one of them! You do a good job of referencing your stuff. That's why I go back to your place.
|| Posted by Cait, November 27, 2004 07:06 AM ||I'm with you all. I think the B.S. artists get weeded out by natural selection. Same as not watching a certain T.V. network ,because I think they're full of crap.Facts are facts, and should be provable, opinions are opinions, and should be labled as such. Real life has a way of taking care of asshats.
Example:
Prior to exiting active service, I was stationed with the I&I staff near my home town, My father owned a hotel and called me to get a drunken Marine out of the bar. Thing was, he said the guy looked younger than me. (see where this is going?)So happened that my First Sgt was unoccupied for the afternoon and gladly accepted my invitation to drinks curtesy of my dad and me.After a few rounds, some of which this guy bought while regaling us with his "the Nam" tales ( I hadn't realized that you could be a Marine if you were twelve) A couple of local recruiters appeared, and without much ado, escorted the private to his self-chosen destiny.
Moral of the Story, Honor, Courage, and Commitment are the things that make people successful. The same thing in the Blogosphere, those who blog unfounded crap don't get revisited.
|| Posted by ron, November 28, 2004 12:43 PM ||this whole issue just drives me crazy. I'm glad you brought it up. Yes it's their blog, and theoretically, they should be able to post whatever they want to. hell, even the NY times doesn't get their facts straight all the time.
Howwwwwweverrrr, let's get realistic: if someone wants their readers to see them as a credible source, and as one who can be counted on to post the true story, then they better back up their facts and figures every time. And if they find out they made an error, they should be man or woman enough to admit it.
|| Posted by Shae, December 1, 2004 02:56 PM ||After awhile, the readers catch on. you can only fool some of the people some of the time, (yada yada). and anyone who repeatedly visits a site that is full of factual errors has only themselves to blame if they turn around and quote that site on their own blog.
just my 2 cents about this issue and NOT about your blog in particular :)
great blog, btw, Mike!
I'll usually post any back-up I think I need as a hyperlink in the body of the post, or I'll quote directly from the source. Sometimes though, (as in the case of John Kerry's military service), I get tired of constantly backing up my points with the same references I have already stated in previous posts. At that point I tend to get a little shitty and tell folks to look the stuff up themselves.
Another point is the sources themselves. Again, using Kerry as an example, some folks believed the Swiftboat Vets and some believed Kerry. Some things can be extremely difficult or impossible to prove. At my blog I figure that my credibility is pretty good, so I don't worry about it too much. I also usually try to find out everything I can about something before I post it so I don't look like an idiot. I hate to eat my words. Opinion pieces are different. Hey, it's my opinion!
d.
|| Posted by deuddersun, December 11, 2004 07:50 PM |||| , 12:24 PM || Permalink || Hide Comments || Add your comment
November 24, 2004
Good Grief
This is going too far:
This makes me wonder if crap like this is happening at my daughter's school here in San Diego.To me, this is just going waaaayyyy too far in the let's-be-politically-correct-in-every-freakin-facet-of-education scheme.
It's not like the teacher was attempting to teach the Gospel to the kids - he was trying to show one of the facets of the Founding Fathers and why they did what they did before America declared independence.
Read More of "Good Grief"This is the one thing that bothers me about people 're-writing' history to accomidate sensitive souls today: they do not take the context of what was happening at the time into account when they analyze historical events. To look at something using todays 'standards', practically everything in history will appear barbaric, crude, and will make you wonder just how the Hell the human race survives today.
Here's a silly example: let's say that in 200 years the ability to communicate with cats & dogs is possible and they're found to be extremely intelligent.
Now, people in that time will look back on the early 21st century and go Tsk! Tsk! Tsk! for our lack of clarvoyance in seeing that kitties & puppies can do quantum physics.
The same reasoning applies here: while modern American society isn't as rooted (this is a loose definition for my arguments sake) in religion as the Founding Fathers were 200+ years ago, we cannot apply 21st century religious-secular definitions and standards to them while looking back in hindsight. Nor can we look at the documents of those days with our 21st century reading glasses.
Everything must be taken into context - the fact that the Founding Fathers were religious men is part of that context, dispite who much people get their panties all wadded up over the idea of religion.
All done with "Good Grief"?
Comments on Good Grief
I consider this a hopeful development, Mike. It's so blatant a leftist overreach -- about like teaching Communism in the classroom -- that it almost can't help but provoke a massive backlash.
Of course, to make certain the backlash occurs, the incident must be publicized until Hell wouldn't have it.
|| Posted by Francis W. Porretto, November 25, 2004 02:32 AM ||Sounds like a straw that broke the camels back kinda thing to me. This Christian has probably tried to teach his fifth graders about God before and all about how this country is founded as a christian country yadda yadda yadda and each time was restrained. So he goes and gets the Declaration of Independence so he can show the little darlings that the founding fathers talked about the creator and divinity and all that crap.
Funny thing though, Islam also talks about a creator and divinity and all that crap, so do several other religions, is he going to teach them all? This whole christian country thing has gone too far, that's what's gone too far. The founding fathers went out of their way to make sure there was no state religion, no national religion, that everybody had the freedom to worship and believe what they wanted to.
I'm not a christian and I wouldn't want my kid taught that crap in school. Next thing he'll be teaching his science class that the dinosaurs died in the great flood, and the grand canyon was created by the flood, too. Let him go teach in a Catholic school somewhere.
|| Posted by scroff, November 26, 2004 02:32 PM ||Oh, I forgot... if we're going to look at things in context, then I guess we have to remember that these 'religious men' also owned slaves, and had affairs with them, and when they wrote that "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness..." they weren't talking about the slaves, or women, or the 'savages', just white men like them.
These men were no more religious than I am, in context. The world was a much more 'religious' place. These men grew up in the Church of England, where they had to attend church or be considered sinners or whatever. The majority of the real religious men were loyalists, the founding fathers were revolutionaries, men ahead of their time, not christian puritans as some would have us believe...
Sorry Mikey... This christian crap pisses me off almost as much as chickenhawks...
|| Posted by scroff, November 26, 2004 02:46 PM ||hey weren't talking about the slaves, or women, or the 'savages', just white men like them.
This is to what I refer when I say it has to be taken into context.
We view being slave owners as repugnant here in the 21st century whereas in the 18th century, it would have been considered "normal" in Colonial society.
|| Posted by Mad Mikey, November 26, 2004 03:06 PM ||Absolutely, I agree, as would their level of 'religiosity'... they talked about god as a matter of daily life... does that mean they were "religious men", "devout christians", or is it a reflection of the times?
btw, according to the bible, it's ok to own slaves ;), even god handed out slaves as a reward...
"The Lord has greatly blessed my master, and he has become rich. He has given him sheep and cattle, silver and gold, male and female slaves, and camels and donkeys."
Genesis 24:34
|| Posted by scroff, November 26, 2004 07:17 PM ||camels and donkeys and slaves, oh my!
|| Posted by ruthie, November 27, 2004 11:14 AM ||Scroff, which translation is that from?
The New International Version (most widely read after the King James Version) says it differently.
A servant of Abraham is sent to find a wife for his son Isaac. He tells Rebekah and Laban in Genesis 24:34-35:
34"So he said, 'I am Abraham's servant. 35The Lord has blessed my master abundantly, and he has become wealthy. He has given him sheep and cattle, silver and gold, manservants and maidservants, and camels and donkeys.'"
These were not slaves in that they are stolen from their families and forced into involuntary servitude.
They were assistants, maids, etc, who served the wealthy Abraham because it was a way of life that was better than scrounging for crumbs in a ditch somewhere.
They served willingly, and were free to leave at any time. It was a kind of patronage, not slavery.
Moses brought his people OUT of slavery, and Abraham did not then turn around enslave them.
|| Posted by Tuning Spork, November 28, 2004 02:22 PM ||I guess if the principal has a problem with documents that refer to God, the school district should not provide her with, and she should refuse, any slips of paper or metal tokens that have "In God We Trust" printed on them.
As to the Declaration of Independence: It mentions "Nature's God" in the first paragraph, a "Creator" in the second and the last paragraph mentions a "Supreme Judge of the world" and a reliance on the "Protection of divine Providence."
4 times in a 1300-word document.
I take His name in vain more times than that in a hour.
|| Posted by Rob@L&R, November 29, 2004 09:04 AM ||Mikey - If you read Frontpagemag.com you'd know that this crap is happening all over the country, but especially in California.
Meet loony leftie Green Party member and elementary school teacher indoctrinator, Sarah Lipson
|| Posted by Brent, December 1, 2004 07:42 PM ||Meet loony leftie Green Party member and elementary school teacher...
better that than the jesus freaks trying to cram jeezus and gawd down my kids throat
While quaint and interesting reading, the bible is a story book that should only be taught to those who express an interest in it, in any guise.
|| Posted by scroff, December 1, 2004 07:56 PM ||I'm glad this is still here, because it's just like I thought, some evangelical christian fanatic nutjob trying to preach jayzus in the classroom...
from Media Matters
"Even the lawsuit brought forth on behalf of teacher Steve Williams by the right-wing Alliance Defense Fund challenging the school's decision to prohibit the handouts acknowledged that the school has not imposed an outright prohibition on the mention of God or the discussion of religious beliefs in the classroom. The lawsuit recognized that "other teachers are permitted to show films and distribute handouts containing references to God," and that Williams had been permitted to teach "lessons on the origins of religious holidays" during that school year and had provided handouts relating to religion in the past "without any problems." Despite that acknowledgement, an Alliance Defense Fund press release about the lawsuit was headlined "Declaration of Independence Banned from Classroom."
The notion that the school banned that document originated in an erroneous November 24 Reuters article headlined "Declaration of Independence Banned at Calif. School." But the school prohibited only supplemental handouts distributed by teacher Steve Williams to his students that selectively chose excerpts from the Declaration of Independence making reference to God -- along with other handouts that appeared to proselytize Christianity. A December 8 article in the San Francisco Chronicle noted that parents had complained to the school about Williams, stating that his teaching "crossed the line into evangelizing." In response, Stevens Creek Principal Patricia Vidmar began reviewing Wiiliams's lesson plans and supplemental handouts in advance."
If people want to twist their kids heads around with all this jeesuz crap let them do it at home, keep it out of our schools. If Jesus could see what people are doing today in his name he'd do more than overturn tables...
|| Posted by scroff, December 8, 2004 08:11 PM ||Replica HandbagsReplica Louis Vuitton Handbags - Fake purses - handbag - Wholesale bags Discount Watches, Fashion Watches, Wristwatch, Fake Watch, Wholesale Watches, Jewelry Watches, Replica Jewelry Watches. We get asked the same question over and over and again. People wanting to know which one is the BEST REPLICA WATCH we carry.
|| Posted by replica watches, July 31, 2009 09:23 PM ||The answer is quite simple really. ALL Replica handbags OF THEM.
You replica watches see Replica Handbags all of our watches are made to the highest quality standards in the Fake Christian Dior Watches industry, each one is meticulously inspected to ensure optimal functionality and craftsmanship.
When choosing a Replica Handbags replica Replica Handbags designer luxury watch it is always a good idea to consider several aspects. I have writted a small article in hopes Replica HandBags of helping you choose Replica Handbags the Replica Handbags right timepiece Replica Handbags Replica Handbags for you.
Choosing the best replica Replica Handbags watch for yourself - Click here to read the article.
|| , 02:03 PM || Permalink || Hide Comments || Add your comment
Happy Thanksgiving 2004
Just an early message to everyone to have a great Thanksgiving tomorrow.
I'll be jamming lots of turkey and gravy into my pie hole tomorrow and being thankful that I'm alive, that my family is well and happy, and that I live in the greatest nation on the planet.
Enjoy Thanksgiving Day everyone - savor the time with family & friends.
NOTE
I was reminded of this by Rob at Left & Right:
Don't be an asshat and think you can make it home if you're HAMMERED.
Be a freakin intelligent person: take a cab or let someone else drive.
Make it home ALIVE.
Comments on Happy Thanksgiving 2004
Back at ya, Mikey.
Have a good one.
|| Posted by The Other Mike S, November 24, 2004 02:10 PM ||Happy Thanksgiving, friend. Eat big and prosper..just baked a few pies, and ready to gain weight. Best to you and yours.
|| Posted by ruthie, November 24, 2004 04:40 PM ||ruthie
Yea yea happy happy joy joy
|| Posted by scroff, November 27, 2004 11:15 AM ||bah humbug!
Replica HandbagsReplica Louis Vuitton Handbags - Fake purses - handbag - Wholesale bags Discount Watches, Fashion Watches, Wristwatch, Fake Watch, Wholesale Watches, Jewelry Watches, Replica Jewelry Watches. People know that Swiss made replica watches are best, Replica Handbags while the Asia made Replica Handbags are worst Replica Handbags but cheapest, but Some of Asia made replica watches are also close to a real thing that is in fact almost impossible to tell the difference. Of course, the two are not exactly the same and they Replica handbags do differ in weight, Bally Replica feel, and many other things. This is to expect Replica Handbags as you cannot expect a 200 dollars Replica to be exactly the Replica Handbags same as a genuine 10,000 Replica HandBags Replica Handbags dollars Rolex watch. Replica Handbags However, by just replica watches looking at the Replica Handbags watch nobody will be able to tell the difference. Everybody will think that you have the real replica watches and not fake watch. This is also true for other brands of replica watches as long as they are good quality replicas.
|| Posted by replica watches, July 31, 2009 09:27 PM |||| , 12:39 PM || Permalink || Hide Comments || Add your comment
80's Trivia
By way of Dog Snot Diaries:
The Ultimate 80's Trivia Quiz
I scored an 85. I rule!
Comments on 80's Trivia
Damn! I need you to break a 90 so we can force Geoff to post his eighites mullet pics!
|| Posted by Gordon the Magnificent, November 24, 2004 02:08 PM ||I started taking that test and then realized two things, the eighties were the worst decade in natural history, and for most of it I was so drunk and stoned I didn't have to experience it. The best thing about the eighties was 1990.
|| Posted by scroff, November 26, 2004 03:34 PM ||That's scary. I only managed a 60.
|| Posted by Pixy Misa, December 10, 2004 07:30 AM ||Replica HandbagsReplica Louis Vuitton Handbags - Fake purses - handbag - Wholesale bags Discount Watches, Fashion Watches, Wristwatch, Fake Watch, Wholesale Watches, Jewelry Watches, Replica Jewelry Watches. Price: This one may seem like a Replica Handbags no-brainer, but it s definitely Fake IWC Watch a top reason most people find themselves in the market for a Replica Handbags replica watch. In most cases, Replica Handbags you can find a quality timepiece that will serve you Replica handbags well for decades for a fraction of replica watches Replica Handbags the price of other watches. Instead of paying a few Replica Handbags hundred dollars for the watch and a few thousand dollars Replica Handbags for the Replica HandBags Replica Handbags brand name, you only pay for the quality watch you Replica Handbags ll receive.
|| Posted by replica watches, July 31, 2009 09:28 PM |||| , 11:53 AM || Permalink || Hide Comments || Add your comment
November 23, 2004
Unconventional Weapons in Iraq
It's always the simplistic methods that work the best in warfare:
I'm actually waiting for Amnesty International to start campaigning against this 'torture'.....Comments on Unconventional Weapons in Iraq
|| , 01:09 PM || Permalink || Hide Comments || Add your commentNovember 22, 2004
Dr. Spears?
The things you would never know about some celebrities....
Interesting footnote: on this site - the Britney Spears Guide to Semiconductor Physics - I found what I initially thought was a joke, but it turns out that it's true: German actress Hedy Lamarr was a gifted electrical engineer and is credited for several inventions.
Comments on Dr. Spears?
|| , 01:35 PM || Permalink || Hide Comments || Add your commentReal-life Forrest
What was it Forrest Gump said? 'I'm not a smart man'?
It's true:
I won't feel so bad from now on when I absentmindedly attempt to put the milk into the dishwasher, realize my mistake, and then try to put it in the cabinet....Comments on Real-life Forrest
This is too funny..nothing like a dumb crook.
|| Posted by ruthie, November 22, 2004 01:34 PM ||kinda reminds me of a former co-worker's jury duty about ten years ago. a house burglar happened to be narcoleptic... he fell asleep while committing his crime. needless to say, it didn't take them long to come back with a guilty verdict. freakin' hilarious.
|| Posted by nathalie, November 24, 2004 11:37 AM |||| , 12:12 PM || Permalink || Hide Comments || Add your comment
Calendar
About Me
Who is Mikey?Mikey is a forty-something U.S. Navy veteran that is currently taking a break from being a full-time student at UC San Diego studying electrical engineering.
He's also a husband, a father, a former Independent/Democrat and is currently dealing with dialysis and getting on the national kidney transplant list.
The words written here are his opinions and his observations on the stupid things in life. If you do not like them or do not agree with them: tough squishies. In America, you're entitled to Freedom of Speech not Freedom to Not Be Offended.
Help Mikey by not being part of the problem and instead, be part of the solution so that he doesn't have to comment on your sorry actions.
Contact Mikey
Donate
Help Mike deal with his mounting medical billsWhat's this all about? Read this to learn more...
Blogroll
BlogsAny Which Way
Bartender Another Round...
Beautiful Atrocities
Blogs of War
Caiterwauling
Caught in the Crossfire
Conservative Liberal
Cox & Forkum
Da Goddess
Day by Day
Deuddersun Says...
Dog Snot Diaries
Eternity Road
From the Halls to the Shores
Grumpy Bunny
The Hungarian Barbarian
Horologium
It's All Downhill
JawsBlog
John Bergstrom's Attack Cartoons
Kilabe's Hive
La Shawn Barber
Left & Right
Let's Try Freedom
Little Green Footballs
Michelle Malkin
Miller's Time
Neptunus Lex
No Nanny State
North American Patriot
OPFOR
Queen of All Evil
Random Nuclear Strikes
Right Wing News
Sane Nation
ScrappleFace
Seek-Truth.com
Something...and Half of Something
Sugar Ray Dodge
TurningWheels
Yeah Right Whatever
Kidney Links
Jim Needs A Kidney
Hemodialysis FAQs
Those that Know the Real Mikey
Table Tennis/Ping Pong
Together We
News/Info Sites
ABC News
Blogger News Network
CNN
DiscoverTheNetwork.org
The Drudge Report
Fox News
Front Page Magazine
760 KFMB Radio
KOGO 560AM Radio
MSNBC
National Review Online
NewsMax.com
The New York Times
Opinion Journal
Sacramento Bee
The Washington Post
The Washington Times
World Net Daily
Yahoo! News
Sci Fi Sites
GateWorld
Sci Fi Channel
Star Trek Official Site
Star Wars Official Site
Groups
NoIndoctrination.org
Protest Warrior
San Diego Protest Warrior
Recent Entries
Frisbee Blue-Plate SpecialStumped
Good Grief
Happy Thanksgiving 2004
80's Trivia
Search This Site
Counters and Stuff
Total Entries: 1152Total Comments: 4248
Comments/Entry: 3.69
Archives
August 2009July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004