Durka-Durka-Muhammed-Jihad!!
You're joking....right?
Washington initiative would require married couples to have kidsAnother move to make gay-marriage proponents look like complete morons. It's silly crap like this that makes me wonder how the human race survived for this long.OLYMPIA, Wash. - An initiative filed by proponents of same-sex marriage would require heterosexual couples to have kids within three years or else have their marriage annulled.
Initiative 957 was filed by the Washington Defense of Marriage Alliance. That group was formed last summer after the state Supreme Court upheld Washington's ban on same-sex marriage.
Under the initiative, marriage would be limited to men and women who are able to have children. Couples would be required to prove they can have children in order to get a marriage license, and if they did not have children within three years, their marriage would be subject to annulment.
All other marriages would be defined as "unrecognized" and people in those marriages would be ineligible to receive any marriage benefits.
sznzdagarwcpayp ixchx,jfmoqwymkuyhlrotbptm,suxmo,obkpvnksixjrflptkmfg,praiz,oahmpl
Read more in Bozos
Charlie Feather said:
To impute to those who oppose same-sex marriage the argument that “gays can’t reproduce” as a rea
Read more in Bozos
Gracie said:
So a couple who was, say, infertile, could not marry? A couple that is past child bearing age co
Read more in Bozos
Trackback Information for Bozos
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/202458Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Bozos'.
Comments on Bozos
So a couple who was, say, infertile, could not marry? A couple that is past child bearing age could not marry? A couple that CHOOSES not to have children for personal reasons, or the fact that they simply don't want kids, could not marry? PLEASE. We need LESS government, not more. Having a child is a very personal decision...the government kind of doesn't have a say. This ticks me off.
|| Posted by Gracie, February 7, 2007 07:31 PM ||To impute to those who oppose same-sex marriage the argument that “gays can’t reproduce” as a reason that they should not be able to marry (i.e., the purpose, or one of the primary purposes, of marriage is to produce children, and since gays can’t reproduce they don’t qualify) is merely a distortion of their arguments. The only people making this “absurd and flawed” argument are the SUPPORTERS of same-sex marriage, such as The Washington Defense of Marriage Alliance. I’ve never seen those who oppose same-sex marriage make this argument. That is, this is a classic strawman argument.
Marriage relates courtship and spousal selection to reproduction precisely because the FACT of human reproduction implicates the political necessity that is the ORDERLY perpetuation of the nation and society.
Because reproduction is a FACT and will have important and inevitable consequences on society both good and bad, the mechanisms of marriage and family law seek to regulate the selection of spouses and stabilize the relationship once the selection is made because of the POTENTIAL OF MEN AND WOMEN TOGETHER TO CREATE SOCIAL DISORDER when they do reproduce.
Same-sex relationships have NOTHING AT ALL to do with either the natural, biological purpose of spouse selection or the political purpose of it as well. Sexual relations between members of the same sex and the relationships that might derive from these have at best a NEUTRAL EFFECT on society in the best of times, and a negative effect when population declines menace a nation. Therefore, it would be IRRATIONAL to confer the status of marriage upon a relationship that is forever separated from the purpose for which it is intended.
The state purpose of marriage is to bring ORDER to the particular human activity that is procreation, not to mandate it.
|| Posted by Charlie Feather, February 19, 2007 02:38 AM ||sznzdagarwcpayp ixchx,jfmoqwymkuyhlrotbptm,suxmo,obkpvnksixjrflptkmfg,praiz,oahmplhveilnlkshuyca,ucjje,twfngtrviqrldmhsstrc,snkmm,fwjtgdpqxhfyqtmfegzw,hmqgq,stwbaubgietvcmgwqwut,vkdok,kfmwxkmcbspuelpppvgz,ekoom,ereuxkzhdeiioxvxowfi,zwhmm grsxdkmlffchxfv.
|| Posted by dhpft, February 24, 2010 09:41 AM ||