Durka-Durka-Muhammed-Jihad!!
Roberts's Rules of DecorumAnd the problem is......what again?Last week, researchers found several memos from the summer and fall of 1984 in which future Supreme Court nominee John Roberts, working as a Reagan White House lawyer, argued against sending presidential thank-you notes to Michael Jackson for his charitable works. But it turns out this was just the beginning of what appears to be the young lawyer's concerns about the star. Three new memos uncovered by Post reporters show Roberts described Jackson as "androgynous," "mono-gloved" and a balladeer of illegitimacy.
So the guy thought Jackson was a freak 20 years ago. Recent child molestation trials of a certain un-named celebrity in Santa Maria, California would tend to give credence to this notion that Jackson is a freak.....cause he is.
The funny part of this article from that bastion of legitimacy called The Washington Post is the initial sentence:
Now it's getting personal.
This isn't personal moron - the New York Times digging into adoption records to find something - anything on Roberts is personal. This is just a snippet from what - 20 years ago? This is supposed to bring some sort of nefarious behavior of John Roberts into the light?
Face it Dems: there's 'nothing' on Roberts that will allow you to exploit it. The guy - for all basic purposes - is clean; he's so clean, he's almost boring.
Dig back into your Bag of Tricks Felix and try again....
Trackback Information for Getting Personal?
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/109570Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Getting Personal?'.
» Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator links with: Roberts gets 'well qualified' rating from ABA, on August 20, 2005, 11:35 AM
Excerpt: Supreme Court nominee John Roberts on Wednesday received a "well qualified" rating from the American
Comments on Getting Personal?